<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax Plans (that&#8217;s one for you, nineteen for me).</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/taxplans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9</link>
	<description>the madness ends here.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Gable &#187; Microsoft Excel Does Not Excel at Graphing</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Gable &#187; Microsoft Excel Does Not Excel at Graphing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>[...] have a good recommendation for a better software program. The excellent redrawings at the chartjunk blog were done in Adobe Illustrator, according to their metadata (I&#8217;ve not heard back from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have a good recommendation for a better software program. The excellent redrawings at the chartjunk blog were done in Adobe Illustrator, according to their metadata (I&#8217;ve not heard back from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Cukier &#187; Flowing Data&#8217;s chart contest</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Cukier &#187; Flowing Data&#8217;s chart contest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2357</guid>
		<description>[...] a few words about the design. I took some of the colours from a chart I really liked, by Viveka Weiley. In her chart she uses the MyriadPro font (guess she&#8217;s a Mac, but I&#8217;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a few words about the design. I took some of the colours from a chart I really liked, by Viveka Weiley. In her chart she uses the MyriadPro font (guess she&#8217;s a Mac, but I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCain &#38; Obama Tax Plans: Small Change &#124; Newsami</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain &#38; Obama Tax Plans: Small Change &#124; Newsami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>[...] Viveka Weiley redrew  Washington Post&#8217;s chart of Obama&#8217;s and McCain&#8217;s respective tax plans. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Viveka Weiley redrew  Washington Post&#8217;s chart of Obama&#8217;s and McCain&#8217;s respective tax plans. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Informatie design</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>Informatie design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>[...] De tweede is van chart junkie: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] De tweede is van chart junkie: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: you really don&#8217;t want to know &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fundamentals</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2344</link>
		<dc:creator>you really don&#8217;t want to know &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fundamentals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2344</guid>
		<description>[...] areas, and was reminded just how huge the income gap is between myself and these people. You know that bar graph comparing Obama&#8217;s tax proposals to McCain&#8217;s? Yeah, that top 0.1% of the richest people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] areas, and was reminded just how huge the income gap is between myself and these people. You know that bar graph comparing Obama&#8217;s tax proposals to McCain&#8217;s? Yeah, that top 0.1% of the richest people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will develop framework for food &#187; Joe, HENRY and taxes</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>Will develop framework for food &#187; Joe, HENRY and taxes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>[...] decrease under McCain&#8217;s plan). It is helpful, also, to take a look at that same graph, but with the height of each bar adjusted to reflect the population size of each bracket (from chartj...). One perspective on this is that the Obama tax plan is a nice tax break for the vast majority of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decrease under McCain&#8217;s plan). It is helpful, also, to take a look at that same graph, but with the height of each bar adjusted to reflect the population size of each bracket (from chartj&#8230;). One perspective on this is that the Obama tax plan is a nice tax break for the vast majority of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCain-Palin &#124; theacousticlife.com</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain-Palin &#124; theacousticlife.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>[...] tax cuts for all (see charts here) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tax cuts for all (see charts here) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkPeppers.com &#187; Tax policy and the candidates</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2330</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkPeppers.com &#187; Tax policy and the candidates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 02:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2330</guid>
		<description>[...] Check out the following graph from here: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out the following graph from here: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kjl</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2329</link>
		<dc:creator>kjl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2329</guid>
		<description>I like the chart, but the chart is not labeled in any way; it is impossible to tell what it means.  The Washington Post chart has a column for "average change in taxes" which is handy, but the overall chart is labeled confusingly (It says "Average percentage change in after-tax income", which is actually backwards; a negative number in the chart would imply you keep LESS money instead of more).

e.g. if I make the median income of $50K and currently pay $8800 taxes (I keep $41200) and I look at your chart to see how my taxes change under Obama, I have no idea what -2.4% under Obama's plan means.  Does it mean, as implied by the WPost chart, that my take-home income goes up by 2.4% (I keep $42190 and pay $7810), or my taxes go down by 2.4% of my total income (i keep $42400 and pay $7600), or my taxes go down by 2.4% of what I paid last year (I keep and pay $41400 and pay $8590) ?

Furthermore, it would help if the Y axis was also labeled - it is not clear if the columns represent actual incomes or if they represent tax brackets.  e.g. if I make $50K a year, it is not clear whether I should just look up the number in the $37K - $66K column (-2.4%), or if I have to do the progressive tax bracket thing (subtract 5.5% from the first $19K I made, then subtract 3.6% from the money I made between $19K and $37K, and then subject 2.4% from the money I made between $37K and $55K).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the chart, but the chart is not labeled in any way; it is impossible to tell what it means.  The Washington Post chart has a column for &#8220;average change in taxes&#8221; which is handy, but the overall chart is labeled confusingly (It says &#8220;Average percentage change in after-tax income&#8221;, which is actually backwards; a negative number in the chart would imply you keep LESS money instead of more).</p>
<p>e.g. if I make the median income of $50K and currently pay $8800 taxes (I keep $41200) and I look at your chart to see how my taxes change under Obama, I have no idea what -2.4% under Obama&#8217;s plan means.  Does it mean, as implied by the WPost chart, that my take-home income goes up by 2.4% (I keep $42190 and pay $7810), or my taxes go down by 2.4% of my total income (i keep $42400 and pay $7600), or my taxes go down by 2.4% of what I paid last year (I keep and pay $41400 and pay $8590) ?</p>
<p>Furthermore, it would help if the Y axis was also labeled - it is not clear if the columns represent actual incomes or if they represent tax brackets.  e.g. if I make $50K a year, it is not clear whether I should just look up the number in the $37K - $66K column (-2.4%), or if I have to do the progressive tax bracket thing (subtract 5.5% from the first $19K I made, then subtract 3.6% from the money I made between $19K and $37K, and then subject 2.4% from the money I made between $37K and $55K).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Questions for John McCain &#171; The Liquid Thinker</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2328</link>
		<dc:creator>Questions for John McCain &#171; The Liquid Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2328</guid>
		<description>[...] is it that after Obama has repeatedly stated, and charts clearly show, that he plans on decreasing taxes (more than you in many cases) for the majority of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is it that after Obama has repeatedly stated, and charts clearly show, that he plans on decreasing taxes (more than you in many cases) for the majority of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Obama Tax Plan Calculator &#124; Fresh Leads Unite</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2327</link>
		<dc:creator>The Obama Tax Plan Calculator &#124; Fresh Leads Unite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2327</guid>
		<description>[...] may be in a small, culturally if not financially elite demographic, Viveka Welly at chartjunk did a clever, Edwart Tufte-esque redrawing of a Washington Post graphic that charts both the candidates&#8217; tax plans and their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may be in a small, culturally if not financially elite demographic, Viveka Welly at chartjunk did a clever, Edwart Tufte-esque redrawing of a Washington Post graphic that charts both the candidates&#8217; tax plans and their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walkerw</title>
		<link>http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2326</link>
		<dc:creator>Walkerw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chartjunk.karmanaut.com/?p=9#comment-2326</guid>
		<description>Wow!  You did what I wished I had had time to do when I saw the Washington Post graph.  I wanted to use it, so did a simple paste up in a page layout program to &lt;a href="http://walkerwillingham.com/public/ObamaTaxCut.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;modify it &lt;strong&gt;in the right direction&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, but was &lt;a href="http://walkerw.blogspot.com/2008/09/my-quick-sheet.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;painfully aware that it was a very partial compensation&lt;/a&gt; for the shortcomings of the original.

Nice site.  I went on to your post about the test scores / TV in room vs computer available chart.  I guess I'm used to bad charts because the reversal of the expected effect was the FIRST thing I noticed about it, though your commentary about the layout generally, silly grouping, and distracting elements and colors were all apt as well.  Your clear dot alternative was nicely fabricated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  You did what I wished I had had time to do when I saw the Washington Post graph.  I wanted to use it, so did a simple paste up in a page layout program to <a href="http://walkerwillingham.com/public/ObamaTaxCut.pdf" rel="nofollow">modify it <strong>in the right direction</strong></a>, but was <a href="http://walkerw.blogspot.com/2008/09/my-quick-sheet.html" rel="nofollow">painfully aware that it was a very partial compensation</a> for the shortcomings of the original.</p>
<p>Nice site.  I went on to your post about the test scores / TV in room vs computer available chart.  I guess I&#8217;m used to bad charts because the reversal of the expected effect was the FIRST thing I noticed about it, though your commentary about the layout generally, silly grouping, and distracting elements and colors were all apt as well.  Your clear dot alternative was nicely fabricated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
